Task
“Exponential decay” describes a situation in which a quantity decreases following a certain pattern. We’re going to investigate a situation that decays exponentially. Read through steps 1-6 below and answer questions a-c before carrying out the investigation.
1. Get your hands on 30 6-sided dice and put them in a container.
2. Find a safe place where you can roll 30 dice at once, like a tray (or the container itself, if it is large enough).
3. Roll the remaining dice (or shake the container thoroughly).
4. Remove any dice that display a "1" and set them aside.
5. Write down how many dice remain.
6. Go back to step 3 and repeat. Stop when you have rolled the dice ten times.
Pre-investigation questions:
-
When you roll 30 dice, how many 1’s do you predict you are likely to roll? Why?
-
After you remove the 1’s on the first roll, what fraction of the original number of dice do you predict will remain?
- How many times do you predict you might have to roll the dice and remove the 1’s before you get to a roll where you don’t roll any 1’s?
Conduct the Investigation:
Construct a table to record the number of 1’s and the number of dice remaining after each roll, as shown.
|
Roll
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
Number of 1’s
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Dice Remaining
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now for some mathematical modeling:
-
Use technology to create a scatter plot with number of dice remaining on the vertical axis and roll number on the horizontal axis. Discuss what you see.
-
Based on what you know about exponential functions and the behavior of dice, explain in words why an exponential model would be appropriate for this situation.
-
Based on what you know about exponential functions and 6-sided dice, write a function of the form \(d(x)=ab^x\) to model the relationship between the roll number, x, and the number of dice remaining, d(x). Your job here is to decide what numbers to use in place of a and b. This should not be based on the data you collected -- it is a mathematical model for how dice behave.
-
Graph your function on the same set of axes as your scatter plot. Compare and contrast the graphed model d(x) to the outcome of the experiment shown in the scatter plot.
- Suppose someone repeated this activity, except they started with 100 8-sided dice instead of 30 6-sided dice. Write a new function that would model this situation.
Here is a tool that could be used in this task:
IM Commentary
Here is an editable version of the student handout:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RQcyCS6eDI1NM0jPBarTAbWPXEqW7hX8tJFRm06bzZM/copy
This task provides concrete experience with exponential decay. It is intended for students who know what exponential functions are, but may not have much experience with them, perhaps in an Algebra 1 course.
On carrying out the investigation and collecting data:
In steps 1-3, directions are provided for rolling dice onto a tray OR shaking a container. Once a teacher decides on a mechanism the class will use, unnecessary parts of these instructions could be deleted.
It would be best if students carried out the investigation using physical dice. The basic experiment would have students work in pairs with each pair of students given 30 dice and time to collect their own data.
If a teacher desires, the class could gather collective data instead of each pair of students only working with its own data. One possible method might be for each group to record data to a shared spreadsheet. Then, the function that models the number of dice remaining could be overlayed on all the data or on a class average for each round. Alternatively, if insufficient dice are available, each student could be responsible for rolling only one or two dice and the class could conduct the experiment at the same time, recording on a common data table on the board how many total 1's are rolled (and discarding dice that show a "1"). An advantage to everyone working with the same set of data is that whole-class discussion becomes easier.
Thirty was chosen as the starting number of dice as a compromise between a realistic total number of dice to expect a teacher to provide for a class and enough data to show a pattern. Also, a starting value of 30 facilitates thinking about the model in questions a. and b. because it is a multiple of 6.
If it is impossible to carry out the experiment using dice, students could use a simulator. In a spreadsheet, use =randbetween(1,6) in 30 different cells to simulate rolling 30 dice. (You could even use more cells to simulate starting with more dice.) Count the number of ones by using the countif function. It would be best if students built this themselves, but here is an example of one:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uD-ooM_eUj7uLCoq5JR3pqkEUFxOLfXv-4myEG4bUNA/copy
The worst possible case is to use data that someone else collected, but sample data is provided in the solution, and a teacher could give sample data to students as a last resort. But we strongly recommend taking the time to actually run the experiment so that students have the tactile, concrete experience on which to base their understanding of how the number of dice change and, ultimately, how exponential functions behave.
Some comments on specific components of the task:
(c) Be on the lookout for students who reason that there will only be six rounds by reasoning that five dice in each round will roll a "1." Those students may misunderstand how the number of dice rolled in each round decreases as 1's are discarded.
(d) Teachers should interpret the word "discuss" in a way that makes sense for their class, with discussion taking place either verbally or in writing. If it is the case where many groups of students collected different sets of data, it is to be expected that you might get a data set that does not appear to behave exponentially (for example, it might appear to be quite linear.) "Real" data can behave strangely, and teachers may want to have a few sample data sets that are well-modeled by an exponential function on hand for students to work with instead of the data they collect, in the case that their dice don't behave.
(d) (A separate note on question d.) You could have students run an exponential regression here and compare the regression equation with their model if it makes sense for your class, but this is not necessary.
(e) This is a sophisticated question but important to address at least briefly, and students may use very informal language, for example "On every roll, you expect to remove the same fraction of the dice." It explains why we can jump right to writing an exponential model without considering whether the change in dice might be characterized better by, for example, a linear or quadratic relationship.
(f) Students may get stuck here and be unsure how to proceed. One suggestion is to encourage students to try some numbers in place of a and b, and see what comes out when x is 0, 1, and 2. They should be given time to fiddle around and learn some stuff about how \(a(b)^x\) works for different values of a and b. For even more scaffolding, teachers could disclose that a should be 30 so that students only have to worry about figuring out b.
(g) It is suggested that teachers view this question as an opportunity for students to check and refine their model. For example, if their model uses b = 1/6 in the function that defines d(x) instead of b = 5/6, it should be obvious that something is wrong when they graph it along with the scatter plot.
(h) This question is intended to be used as a check for understanding.
